This raises the eternal question about the validity of any sample and the discussion will go on. Are any of the data from season 2010 useful anymore? Is there a trend? Are there 60 % home wins next season?
There were significantly less goals this season at Veikkausliiga compared to 599 goals on previous season. I for once would had wanted to see some of the narrow TPS 1-0 wins to end up in a draw instead.
Most goals were seen at Kakkonen South, but partly there is LoPa to blame who earned only one point throughout the season. Needless to say that the 2-2 draw away at BK-46 was a costly one, nearly as bad as the cup game on neutral ground vs JäPS who won the Eastern group in the end. At that time bookies got a narrow escape as they offered a -0.5 line for JäPS. (JäPS won after extra time, a fair line would had been around -2). LoPa´s games produced 179 goals with the avg of 6.63 per game.
The % for draws at Kakkonen varies a lot from season and group, but you do not have to be a rocket scientist to see that the high-looking odds of 4.5 for a draw often offer no value. At match totals the line of 2.5 is rarely offered and you can see why.
2012 | Matches | 1 | x | 2 | Goals | Avg | U 2.5 | O 2.5 |
Veikkausliiga | 198 | 52 | 20,7 | 27,3 | 535 | 2,70 | 51 | 49 |
Ykkönen | 135 | 45,9 | 22,2 | 31,9 | 365 | 2,70 | 50 | 50 |
2 South | 135 | 52,6 | 14,1 | 33,3 | 522 | 3,87 | 31 | 69 |
2 East | 135 | 45,9 | 20 | 34,1 | 448 | 3,32 | 31 | 69 |
2 West | 135 | 42,2 | 17,8 | 40 | 469 | 3,47 | 36 | 64 |
2 North | 108 | 42,6 | 20,4 | 37 | 362 | 3,35 | 33 | 67 |
Ei kommentteja:
Lähetä kommentti